Saucer Smear

OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SAUCER & UNEXPLAINED CELESTIAL EVENTS RESEARCH SOCIETY
EDITOR AND STILL
SUPREME COMMANDER:
James W. Moseley

CONTRIBUTING EDITOR:
Karl T. Pflock

NON-SCHEDULED
NEWSLETTER
Volume 52, No. 5
June 15th, 2005
(Whole Number 381)

MAILING ADDRESS:
P. 0. Box 1709
Key West, FL 33041

We welcome your correspondence, pro or con, well-reasoned or otherwise, but please keep in mind that while Saucer Smear is on the Dreaded Internet, your humble editor is NOT! So, if you wish to receive a personal reply to your letter, or wish to have any chance of seeing it printed on Our Glorious Pages, please print it out, put it in an envelope, affix a stamp thereto, and SNAIL mail it to:
James W. Moseley
P.O. Box 1709
Key West, FL 33041

It's simple and loads of fun! Ask your grandma if you don't remember how to do it!

We thank you!


FLASH!
FATE MAGAZINE'S LIST OF "THE 100 MOST INFLUENTIAL PEOPLE IN UFOLOGY TODAY":
ARE YOU ON THE LIST?

We have finally gotten our hands on a portion of Fate Magazine's UFO Special Issue, and we are intrigued by the composition of their list of 100 (actually, 106) leading ufologists. Though some effort has been made to be international in scope (e.g., Esen Sekerkarat of Turkey, whom we've never heard of), the greatest number are Americans, with a few Brits thrown in. In fact, the longest write-up is for Nick Pope, the former British Ministry of Defense Official who has loudly proclaimed the reality of UFOs in recent years.

The list obviously includes only ufologists who are recently or currently active - not voices from the past. This is understandable, but we are not sure what other criteria were used. Film producer Steven Spielberg is here - which might surprise him - and also actor Dan Akroyd, who recently wrote a wild, credulous article for "UFO Magazine". Among the skeptics there's only Phil Klass, though he he is no longer active. And yes, your "Smear" editor did make the list, though modesty forbids us from reprinting our write-up here. There's also our esteemed Contributing Editor Karl Pflock, Lisa Davis of NUFOC, and other friends too numerous to mention.

The most colorful write-up went to famed one-armed Swiss contactee Billy Meier. We quote it in part:

"Acting as a mediator and spokesperson for the Pleiadians from planet Erra, Meier imparts their esoteric teachings and wisdom to us. He has taken more than 1,000 of the clearest UFO photos ever seen. Naturally, many people have come forward to claim that the entire phenomenon is a hoax. Underground Video, Inc., for example states that one of Meler's alleged Pleiadian beamships, taken in 1981, is really a miniature model made out of an upside-down cake pan, disconnected copper hose fittings, a bracelet, carpet tacks, and various other identifiable objects. The Meier photograph of the beautiful Pleiadian alien, Semjase, turned out to be a photocopy of a model from a Sears catalogue."

WAY TO GO, Billy!

"Smear's" expanded "Hall of Shame" list includes the following who are also on Fate's lists: Lucius Farish, Jerry Clark, John Keel, Vicki Cooper, Don Ecker, Richard Hall, Budd Hopkins, and Brad Sparks. (Clark was later removed from our list.) Our "Shame" list also includes the following whom Fate did not pick up: Richard Ogden, an obscure Adamski devotee of yesteryear; Julie Shuster of the Roswell Museum; Bigfooter Erik Beckjord; Todd Zechel of CAUS (Citizens Against UFO Secrecy)l and Wendy Conners. We were surprised that Wendy did not make the Fate list, because we hear that she has created a nice UFO audiovisual library and is definitely a farce to be reckoned with.

We recommend that you send off $9.95 to Fate (P.O. Box 460, Lakeville, Mn. 55044), and they will hopefully mail you this Special Issue as soon as it is again available. (It seems to be mysteriously out of print at the moment!)...


MISCELLANEOUS RAVINGS


Pflock Ptalk - SO WHAT DID WE SEE?

by Karl Pflock, Our Contributing Editor & Fifth Columnist

Last time, I described my childhood multi-witness UFO sighting during the summer of 1951 or 1952. Before reading what follows, it would be helpful to review that column. (If you no longer have your copy - shame! See www.martiansgohome.com/smear). Ready?

The sky was clear as a bell that evening and, in the west, still faintly suffused with the light of the setting sun. If there had been any structure behind and larger than the light, we would have seen it, at least as a silhouette. Similarly, if there had been more than one object, one at the object's original location and one at each of the "jump" points, they would have been visible too. So whatever we were looking at was a single object - just the light itself, a mysteriously self-luminating Something.

The instantaneous displacement of the light certainly was beyond any earthly capacity. The pattern described by the object's movements was precise, seemingly planned, the product of thought, under intelligent control. At the time, we could think of no natural phenomenon or human activity that would explain what we were seeing. In the years since, I've been unable to come up with anything mundane that comes even close. (Any ideas out there in non-subscriber land?)

But what was the purpose of the performance? The obvious answer is that it was a Signal. But who was signaling whom?

There are those in ufology who, upon witnessing something like this, would immediately assume the signal was meant for them. (Calling Dr. Greer!) Well, I have a healthy ego, but the notion that some superior intelligence from Out There (or Wherever) put on that show just for three boys and their fathers is absurd, Was it perhaps meant as a "sign" for the potentially thousands of oeople who might have seen it that night? Well, maybe - but not likely, at least to my mind.

No, if it was a signal, it seems more probable that it was meant for one or a team of their own. Perhaps it was time for an agent on earth (Orthon? Just kidding) to be oicked up or resupplied. But that doesn't seem right either. Surely completely covert, secure communication would be routine for Them, making such an exercise in skywriting both unnecessary and foolish.

So our object's dance probably wasn't a Signal. Perhaps the whole performance was just the work of a saucer pilot showing off. If so, I'll bet he/she/it caught hell when he/she/it returned to the mothership!

The bottom line is we saw something very real, something truly anomalous. That is, we saw a UFO, or at least what would have become a UFO had our experience been objectively and competently investigated and recorded. (See Hynek on this critical distinction).

Or perhaps you, Dear Reader, see an obvious, down-to-earth answer I've missed. If so, I'd love to hear it. On second thought, maybe not. There's little enough Mystery in life these days, even in UFOdom.


MISIVES FROM THE MASSES:


Saucer Smear Index
Saucer Smear Mailbox
Please note that letters for Smear editor James Moseley should be snail-mailed to PO Box 1709, Key West, FL 33041, insofar as Cdr. Moseley is proudly computer-illiterate and determined to stay that way.

Own a genuine artifact of ufological history!
Line your birdcage for pennies a sheet!
Back issues available for the last 50 years!


HTML version by S L M