Saucer Smear
OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SAUCER & UNEXPLAINED CELESTIAL EVENTS RESEARCH SOCIETY
EDITOR AND STILL
SUPREME COMMANDER:
James W. Moseley

CONTRIBUTING EDITOR:
Karl T. Pflock

NON-SCHEDULED
NEWSLETTER
Volume 48, No. 8
September 1st, 2001

MAILING ADDRESS:
P. 0. Box 1709
Key West, FL 33041

38th Annual National UFO Conference


TIDBITS OF TRASH (formerly HOT FLASHES)


THE PASSING PARADE:

Your editor was saddened recently to learn, belatedly, of the death of Michael G. Mann. Only olde time saucerers would remember Mike at all, as his contributions to the UFO Field (if they could be called contributions!) were way back in the 1950s.

Mike had a UFO group briefly with his friend Jonas Kover. Both lived in New York City at the time. Over the years we lost track of both of them, though Mike continued to receive 'Smear'. Then, the other day Mike's widow Marcea informed us that her husband died back on March 12th of this year - from a series of heart attacks followed by Lou Gehrig's Disease. He must have been about the same age as your editor, i.e., circa 70 years old.

Mike Mann will be best remembered for his series of UFO photos over the United Nations Building in New York, over the Eiffel Tower in Paris, over the Washington Monument in D.C., etc. - always the identical saucer! He also wrote at least one article for the old "Saucer News", entitled "Who Is Fooling Major Donald Keyhoe?', or some such title. This was during our long-drawn-out feud with Keyhoe's NICAP organization in Washington, D.C.

Mike was never even as ufologically serious as Gray Barker and your humble "Smear" editor. He enjoyed ufoology, and he enjoyed life. Pity that his life ended so tragically.


JAMES RANDI'S LONG-REMEMBERED "BLACKMAIL TAPE" RIDES AGAIN!

Even though your "Smear" editor is not on the (cursed) Internet himself, we have mysterious, shadowy friends who are - and a couple of them have conspired to send us current information from the permanent anti-Randi Web site - or at least from one of them. (Anyone as arrogant as Randi may well have more enemies than can fit onto one Site, or whatever.)

Anyhow, the "URL" (that's computer talk, man!) is given below. We can't vouch for the veracity of all the other information thereon, but the infamous "Blackmail Tape" of yesteryear is there in full: You can read it or even listen to it, if you are sufficiently technically inclined. We have checked out the transcript, and it is the real "Blackmail Tape'! This is an item so sensitive that no one, including your editor, has ever had the nerve to print it openly!

For those of you not familiar with the "Blackmail Tape", it consists of several short telephone conversations, recorded many years ago from his own phone by the Amusing One himself. Randi appears to be solliciting Sex from these several young men. The only dispute is in regard to the circumstances of the recording. We don't want to get back into all that, as Randi's lawyer is still permanently on our mailing list, ever since he tried to sue us several years ago.

The Forbidden Web Site is:

http://www.geocities.com/randiexpert2001/


PFlock PTalk: DURANT's RANT

by Karl Pflock, Our Contributing Editor & Fifth Columnist

You were expecting maybe Part 2 of "They Were Here"? Tune in next ish for that. This time some comments about a remarkable attack on my new book and me. Written by long-time ufologist Robert Durant, this textbook example of the Will to Believe in action takes up 12 pages of the 32-page Spring issue of CUFOS' magazine "IUR" (also on their web- site: www.cufos.org).

It would require a book to respond adequately, which I've already written: "Roswell: Inconvenient Facts and the Will to Believe". Those genuinely interested in assessing for themselves the soundness of my research, evidence, and conclusions will study "Roswell" with open minds and arrive at their own conclusions rather than relying solely on Durant's opinions. Still, I do want to get a couple of things off my chest.

I am deeply disappointed and quite surprised Bob found it necessary to indulge in subtle and not so subtle ad hominem - even ad hominem by proxy in the form of an attack on my publisher, the dreaded Prometheus. (Just in case shooting the messenger doesn't do the trick, cap his horse, eh, Bob?) I am nearly as disappointed and surprised that CUFOS saw fit to publish such stuff. After all, "IUR" is not "Saucer Smear".

Durant's use of innuendo and the like is illuminating. It tells us he's not nearly as sure of his case as he would like us to believe. It's the True Believer's (or True Unbeliever's) version of the old lawyer's trick of pounding the table when the facts and the law are against him. Durant has very good reason to pound!

This legal analogy really is quite apt. Roswell is historical forensics rather than hard science, and there is no smoking gun. Everything on both sides of the issue is circumstantial. After eight years of painstaking investigation and open-minded consideration of all the evidence, I am reluctantly convinced the case against Roswell as a crashed/retrieved saucer incident easily exceeds the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard of criminal actions. The case for the Project Mogul explanation is not quite that strong. It is very strong nonetheless, more than satisfying the preponderance-of-evidence standard of civil actions.

Bob Durant has laid out his brief in "IUR". I have presented mine in my book. Now it is up to the "jury" to fair-mindedly weigh both in the balance and arrive at a verdict. And, by Fort, it better be the right one: Do ya get me?


BRIEF BOOK BASHINGS


THE READERS STRIKE BACK:


What's Up, Doc?

University of Washington researchers say that one-third of those exposed to a fake Disneyland ad talking about how they met Bugs Bunny and shook his hand later said the event had actually happened to them.

Of course, Bugs Bunny has never appeared at Disneyland because he is a warner Bros. character.

"The frightening thing about this study is that it suggests how easily a false memory can be created,'" Said one of the researchers.

ROSWELL
Karl T. Pflock
Prometheus; $25, 345 pages

Officially, the debris found in early July 1947 near Roswell, N.M., was weather balloon wreckage. According to UFO believers, what really crashed was an alien spaceship which, with the corpses of its crew, was promptly hidden by our government. In "Roswell: Inconvenient Facts and the Will to Believe," Karl Pflock disagrees with both explanations. Pflock, who believes some UFOs are alien spaceships, is a former CIA intelligence officer and onetime deputy assistant secretary of defense. He's also a doggedly persistent investigator who, over eight years, has re-examined every available scrap of evidence about the crash, reinterviewed witnesses, studied and cross-correlated the testimony of those now dead, and ferreted out documents not available to earlier writers. Pflock's conclusion? The weather balloon explanation was a government cover-up that cloaked a then highly secret program to detect Soviet nuclear tests. Given his background, his conclusion is bound to be controversial, but it will take more than howls of outrage to overturn it. Those who give Pflock's book a careful, thoughtful reading will find it hard to disagree with him.
George W. Early
Special to the Oregonian

Saucer Smear Index
Saucer Smear Mailbox
Please note that letters for Smear editor James Moseley should be snail-mailed to PO Box 1709, Key West, FL 33041, insofar as Cdr. Moseley is proudly computer-illiterate and determined to stay that way.

Own a genuine artifact of ufological history!
Line your birdcage for pennies a sheet!
Back issues available for the last 46 years!


HTML version by S L M