Saucer Smear

OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SAUCER & UNEXPLAINED CELESTIAL EVENTS RESEARCH SOCIETY
EDITOR AND STILL
SUPREME COMMANDER:
James W. Moseley

CONTRIBUTING EDITOR:
Karl T. Pflock

NON-SCHEDULED
NEWSLETTER
Volume 48, No. 2
February 20th, 2001

MAILING ADDRESS:
P. 0. Box 1709
Key West, FL 33041


"SMEAR" EDITOR SOARS TO AUTHORDOM, AT LAST!

Nigh on to fifty years after we first had the idea of writing a book about our experiences in and with the UFO field, your ever-so-humble "Smear" editor, together with Contributing Editor Karl Pflock, have obtained a book contract with Prometheus Books of Amherst, New York.

Yes, Prometheus is the publishing arm of the dreaded CSICOP organization which we have discussed frequently over the years. And yes, they do publish books by people like Phil Klass and James Randi. But they have over fifty categories of books, including juicy ones like "Human Sexuality'' and "Gay and Lesbian". They are not the stuffy sort of organization that we imagined, and we look forward to working with them. Most of all, we look forward to publicity tours and appearances on the media. Unfortunately, it will be about a year before the book is completed and actually published.

The title, as we've told our readers many times, is "Shockingly Close to the Truth!" Suggested subtitle: "Confessions of a Grave Robbing Ufologist". Our second book (if we last that long in this incarnation), also with Karl Pflock, will be titled "Grave Robbing for Fun and Profit". This will focus on our strange activities in Peru in the late 1950s.

The above information obviously supersedes the "Very Important Announcement" on Page 8 of our March 15th, 2000 issue. Though Moseley and Pflock continue to work with Phyllis Galde, editor of Fate Magazine, the contract with her separate entity called Galde Press did not work out after all.


HAIL THE NEW MILLENIUM!

Strange things have been going on near Seattle, Washington, ever since New Year's Eve, when a large monolith, amazingly like the one in the classic science-fiction movie "2001", appeared mysteriously in a public park while the park was closed for the night. The dimensions of the monolith are 1 foot by 4 feet by 9 feet the squares of the first three prime numbers (for all you math fans out there!). It's not clear how the stone got there or who did it, but it seems very likely that one or more shadowy local artists' groups were involved. (Back in 1996, one such renegade artist left an 1800 pound metal heart marked "BOMB" in the back of a pickup truck parked downtown, but it turned out to be harmless!)

Three days after the "2001" monolith appeared, and after it had been seen and touched by a number of curious members of the public, it disappeared mysteriously, only to re-appear on a small remote island that is used as a bird sanctuary. Again, no one knows for sure just who did this and how they did it. Apparently there is a spiritual message involved, related to the above-mentioned classic movie.

Sir Arthur Clark, who together with the late Stanley Kubrick, was responsible for "2001" back in 1968, has been receiving a lot of attention this year, and from what we have read he is understandably enjoying it. We of "Smear" hope that the renewed interest in the movie will lead to a renewed interest in space travel, which of course can easily lead to a renewed interest in UFOs. Could 2001 be the Year of the UFO? As the late George Adamski might say, time will tell!


A BLAST FROM THE PAST!

George Adamski, who died way back in 1965, was by far the best known of all the UFO contactees of olde. His first and best-known UFO book, published in 1953 about events which occurred in 1952, was called "Flying Saucers Have Landed", and it actually was a best-seller in its day.

Present-day ufologists in general either know little about Adamski's claims or discount them on general principles. Few realize that (as admitted by historian Jerry Clark) the definitive expose on Adamski was written by your humble "Smear" editor. It is the most thorough bit of serious research that we have ever done, and it was published in October, 1957 in a Special Adamski Expose Issue of the old "Saucer News".

The reason we bring this up now is that Adamski had, in his later years, a much younger co-worker named C.A. (Carol) Honey. Honey based his belief in Adamski mainly on the famed "Desert Contact" of 1952, which is the very same event that we investigated very thoroughly and disproved.

We then paid much less attention to Adamski's subsequent books and activities, whereas it was during this later period that Honey collaborated with him, even ghost-writing some of his material. Honey eventually came to realize that some of Adamski's claims were fabricated (notably his alleged March 1962 trip to Saturn), but Honey still, to this day, has not lost faith in the authenticity of the "Desert Contact".

We assumed that C.A. Honey was deceased by now, as we had not heard from or about him in many years. But just a few weeks ago he surfaced, and is interested in rehashing the Adamski story at this late date - mainly because a still-existent George Adamski Foundation has recently accused him of stealing a lot of Adamski's material for his own.

Honey has published a series of 36 neatly printed pamphlets, some of which discuss in detail his complex relationship with George Adamski. These can be obtained at little or no charge by writing to the author at: 2456 South Woodlark Drive, Ontario, California 91761.

Unfortunately, the 20-page Special Adamski Expose Issue of Saucer News has long been out of print. However, photostatic copies can be obtained for ten dollars each by writing to: Tom Benson, P.O. Box 1174, Trenton, N.J. 08606. Benson also has all of our other back issues through 1995, at lesser prices.


SOME GEMS FROM THE JANUARY 2001 "MUFON JOURNAL"

Your "Smear" editor, who in his prime was a State Section Director (Monroe County, Florida) for MUFON, still remains a loyal Journal Subscriber (J.S.) and receives the monthly Mutual UFO Network UFO Journal - commonly still called the MUFON Journal.

The January 2001 issue contains a number of items worth commenting on, beginning with Page One, which consists of a blurred (Smeared?) version of the cover of Dick Hall's new book, "The UFO Evidence, Vol. II".

The lead article (Page 3), by one Paul Thompson, is an excellent comparison between the mythical MJ-12 group of ufological fame, and the real World War II project with a similar name, which was successfully devoted to breaking the Japanese code. Thompson does not believe in the authenticity of MJ-12. In his discussion he makes a point which your "Smear" editor has argued endlessly over the years, vs. Stanton Friedman, William Moore and others - namely that there is no reason to believe the late Professor Donald Menzel of Harvard University was or could have been a member of MJ-12, if indeed it ever existed! Read this article!

Next we would comment on "Stress Management for Ufologists", a rather silly article written by John Schuessler, the new International Director of MUFON. Among the most important causes of ufological stress, he lists: Too many UFO reports; Too few UFO reports; Debunkers; Critics; Experts and their egos; and Government cover-up. It's just too much about too little; and this 4-page article is due for a follow-up in the next issue!

On Page 13 comes a new feature called "Ufology Profile", consisting of two and a half pages of Ego for (former) nuclear physicist Stanton Friedman. (We wonder when our turn will come??) When asked which wellknown ufologists he is not impressed with, Friedman gave a short list that starts with Kevin Randle. Interesting, because Friedman and Dr. Randle agree generally about the authenticity of the Roswell Incident, and have worked together in the past. However, we are aware of the fact that there is currently "bad blood" between them.

Further along, there's a dreadfully egocentric column in which Dick Hall reviews his own book; and finally there is an excellent article about crop circles by England's Jenny Randles. There are also a few other items not worth mentioning. Conspiciously absent, once again, is any mention at all of the festering controversy regarding John Carpenter, MUFON's esteemed Director of Abduction Research.

See also John Schuessler's letter to the editor, further along in this issue of "Smear"...

You too can receive the MUFON Journal or even become an active MUFONite by writing to P.O. Box 369, Morrison, Colorado 80465. Membership has been slipping badly in recent years, for various reasons, and the organization needs all the help it can get!


TIDBITS OF TRASH:


THINGS THAT GO BUMP IN THE NIGHT

by Karl Pflock, Our Contributing Editor & Fifth Columnist

"Why shouldn't truth be stranger than fiction? Fiction, after all, has to make sense." - Mark Twain

I've just had the pleasure of reading a very interesting and entertaining new book by British Fortean Hilary Evans and his American colleague Patrick Huyghe, "The Field Guide to Ghosts and Other Apparitions", illustrated by Harry Trumbore (Quill/HaperCollins, trade paperback). The most recent in the Field Guides to the Unknown series conjured Up by Huyghe, it's not a routine ghost book. Moreover, quoting Bob "Arcturus Books" Girard, it's a work "any ufologist worth the label will want to study to see if ghosts have any characteristics in common with ufonauts (and purported UFOs, too - KTP)."

In their fascinating, thoughtful, and delightfully written introduction and afterword, the authors offer new slants on and a new typology for ghostly phenomena. These they flesh out (heh, heh) with 50 illustrated cases, mostly drawing upon firsthand testimony spanning he globe and a couple of millennia.

As Evans and Huyghe see it, ghosts are by no means just shades of deceased humans. There are ghosts (?) of the living and not-yet (?) living, as well as of animals, things, and places, including ghost buildings and airfields. There are crisis and non-crisis spooks, and time-slips and harbingers, too. There are even experiencers who, from the perspective of the ghosts and ghostly elsewheres and elsewhens they report having seen or somehow traveled to, may themselves have seemed to be ghosts - or UFOs and ufonauts. (Here, a friendly tip of the hat to the esteemed Lex Mebane. See his letter in the Dec. 1st "Smear".)

How can all this be explained? Are ghosts merely figments of the mind's eye, or are they real in an objective, material sense? Are they perhaps visitors from some alternate reality or universe or the products of eddies in the stream of time, in both cases UFOs of a sort?

The authors consider these and other possibilities, but in true Fortean fashion offer no firm conclusions of their own about the "reality" of ghosts. Instead, they note that, whatever form of existence ghosts may have, the ghost experience - what people "say they saw, heard, maybe even smelt or felt" - is "real enough". They point out that this is what laymen usually mean when they talk of ghosts, whereas scientists rightly concern themselves with matters of existence, physical, measurable attributes. The trouble is, ghosts rarely offer up anything for scientists to get their calipers on and so are dismissed as images born of undigested bits of beef and the like.

Sound familiar, saucer fiends?


LETTERS TO YE OLDE EDITOR:


DO THAT AGAIN
On 9 Oct 1972, the mathematician Dr Jeffrey Hamilton, from Warwick University, wanting to show his students the effect of chance, tossed a 2p coin which spun round and came to rest on its edge. After a stunned silence, dozens of students broke into wild applause for the once-in-a-lifetime achievement. Sunday Telegraph, 7 May 2000
SLOW HAND:
A Florida phone sex operator, now aged 40, won a workers' compensation settlement because she developed carpal tunnel syndrome (RSI) in both hands from masturbating as much as seven times a day while speaking to callers. She was told to do whatever it takes to keep the person on the phone for as long as possible. [R] 20 Nov 1999
ON PAIN OF DEATH:
Gil Bernardi, mayor of the village of Le Lavandou on the French Riviera, issued a decree ordering people not to die. "It is forbidden for any person not in possession of a family vault to die in the village's territory,' it said. The cemetery is full, and a court in Nice has blocked plans for a new one. [AFP]21 Sept; Guardian, 23 Sept 2000
THE LONG GOODBYE:
Kenneth Andrews was accidentally poisoned with the wrong medicine in 1930 following an appendix operation in Hong Kong and was told he had only a short time to live. In World War II he was shot twice, stabbed, bitten by a rabid dog and contracted malaria. He died last March in Bournemouth, aged 106. D. Telegraph, 16 Mar 2000

Saucer Smear Index
Saucer Smear Mailbox
Please note that letters for Smear editor James Moseley should be snail-mailed to PO Box 1709, Key West, FL 33041, insofar as Cdr. Moseley is proudly computer-illiterate and determined to stay that way.

Own a genuine artifact of ufological history!
Line your birdcage for pennies a sheet!
Back issues available for the last 46 years!


HTML version by S L M