Saucer Smear
OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SAUCER & UNEXPLAINED CELESTIAL EVENTS RESEARCH SOCIETY
EDITOR AND STILL
SUPREME COMMANDER:
James W. Moseley

CONTRIBUTING EDITOR:
Karl T. Pflock

NON-SCHEDULED
NEWSLETTER
Volume 46, No. 3
March 15th, 1999

MAILING ADDRESS:
P. 0. Box 1709
Key West, FL 33041


DONATIONS FROM THE DEAD!

We have received a hilarious item from CAUS (Citizens Against UFO Secrecy), headed by an eccentric lawyer named Peter Gersten. Apparently Gersten is giving up his law practice entirely, except for litigation against the government, related to UFOS.

In this recent Internet posting, Gersten states: "CAUS has taken the first step in what will ultimately be lawsuits against each of the 50 states under Article IV, Section IV of the U.S. Constitution, which requires the federal government to protect the states against 'invasion"'.

We doubt if the framers of the Constitution had interplanetary invasion in mind. Furthermore, we are now wondering if Gersten was as off-the-wall as this, back in the early 1980s, when he took charge of the unsuccessful attempt to hold the government responsible for the injuries sustained in 1980 by the three victims in the famed Cash-Landrum Case. In other words, that was a legitimate lawsuit, but it needed to be handled by a really competent lawyer. Was it?

Further along in his posting, Gersten thanks the 3% of his members who have answered his very recent appeal for financial support. About 200 names are then listed, which means he is claiming to have around 6,000 members. The really weird part is this; Among the approximately 200 names of recent contributors are: Donald Keyhoe, Kenneth Arnold, George Adamski, Barney Hill, Jim Lorensen, Coral Lorenzen, and Gray Barker. All of these are leading ufologists of one sort or another, long deceased! Is this a joke of some sort??

Also listed are: anonymous (a frequent contributor to many causes); "UFO Colonel"; Bruce MacCabee (probably refering to Dr. Bruce Maccabee, a living ufologist); John Schuessler (a deputy director of MUFON); "Linda" (maybe meaning Linda Cortille, alias Linda Napolitano, of abduction fame); and Joe Firmage - the new rich guy in the UFO field that we are all trying to get money from!

Something is definitely wrong here! (Our thanks to Antonio Huneeus, Tom Benson & others for this item.) ...


CLARK IS MODERATELY MAD AT US

Predictably, UFO historian Jerry Clark is upset with our lead article in the last "Smear", in which we pointed out his overreaction to Kevin Randle's attempt to join the UFO abduction conference to be held in New York City on April 10th. Randle, a long-time Roswell advocate, has a somewhat skeptical book about abductions coming out shortly, co-authored with Russ Estes and Dr. William Cone.

In his "Not for Publication" letter to "Smear", Clark whines that we are picking on him. Actually, we believe Clark to be an excellent UFO historian, but as an arbitrator of ufoiogical Faith & Morals, he falls short...


THE INSIDE SCOOP ON HARRY S TRUMAN'S UFO VIEWS

A full-page ad in the Feb. 19th issue of the newspaper USA Today is of interest. It was placed there by the International Space Sciences Organization, which is in reality millionaire saucer enthusiast Joe Firmage. Fourteen celebrities or public figures are quoted as to their positive feelings about UFOS. The ad is nicely done, but unfortunately several of the quotes are misleading or taken out of context.

The most extreme example of this is the quote from Harry S Truman which reads: "I can assure you that flying saucers, given that they exist (italics ours), are not constructed by any power on earth". This statement is from a 1950 White House press conference and sounds very impressive, except that the phrase in italics is the key part. We had a brief private meeting with Truman in 1954, after he was out of office, and the quote he gave us regarding flying saucers was simply "I've never seen a purple cow, I never hope to see one ... He refused to add to that statement.

Several years later we attended a Truman press conference (not at the White House), and received similar negative responses from the ex-president in answer to our UFO-related questions. Naturally we never asked about Roswell or MJ-12, as these were still unknown to the public at that time.

This Truman story is one of the items we were saving for our forthcoming book with Karl Pflock, but it looks like the millennium may end before said book is ever published. (Our thanks to hard-core non-subscriber Denis Corey for this item.) ...


APRO IS REALLY DEAD THIS TIME

We recently had an interesting telephone conversation with Reverend William Heft, who, a couple of years ago, seemed to be reviving the ancient UFO research group called APRO (Aerial Phenomena Research Organization). We found this revival hard to believe, because Jim & Coral Lorenzen founded APRO in 1952 and lived in their later years in Tucson, Arizona. Anyhow, Heft now tells us that he has given up on APRO, the new headquarters of which was Heft's home in Illinois. He also admits that he does not have the APRO files. Indeed, Heft has given up on saucer research in general, and is now convinced that there is probably nothing out there to investigate, after all ...


Order your copy of
THE CASH-LANDRUM UFO INCIDENT
from:
John F. Schuessler
9862 West Unser Ave.
Littleton, CO 80128
$19.95/copy
(Outside USA, add $2.00 p&h)


CUTLER MEMO SHOWN TO BE A FAKE

Due to the renewed interest in MJ-12 in recent months, we have decided to share with our readers a fascinating Reference Report from the National Archives in Washington, D.C., dated July 22nd, 1987. You see, the only MJ-12 document actually found in an archives instead of appearing from an unknown source, was the so-called Cutler Memo. It was supposedly found by either William Moore or his friend Jaime Shandera, or both. If it were to be proven genuine, this could be considered proof that a mysterious UFO-related group called MJ-12 actually did/does exist. But alas, this memo is not even a little bit genuine!

The memo in question is from Robert Cutler to General Nathan Twining, dated July 14th, 1954. This was during the Eisenhower administration. The document mentions a meeting of the National Security Council which Twining attended, and where MJ-12 was discussed. Unfortunately, Cutler was out of the country at the time, and there is no record of any NSC meeting on the date this meeting was supposed to have occurred!

There are numerous other problems, of which ten are listed in this Report. It appears that a sincere effort was made by the government to find any other MJ-12 reference whatsoever in governmental files, but none could be found. Obviously the Cutler Memo was placed in the National Archives, by someone with a motive to do so. Who could that possibly be? ...


KEEL GETS A BAD DEAL

According to information we have received, a science-fiction movie called "The Mothman Prophecies" is in the works, and there may even be two separate but similar movie projects - both based vaguely on ufologist John Keel's supposedly true 1970s book with the same title. A title can't be copyrighted, and apparently Keel, who could well use the money, is getting nothing out of either project.

The hero of one of these movies is named John Klein, a name which is obviously similar to John Keel. Weirdly, there is an entity in the movie named Indrid Cole, which is almost the exact name of the spaceman who was met by contactee Woodrow Derenberger many years ago - but this had nothing whatever to do with the Mothman syndrome.

In the UFO field, science fiction and science fact have become so intermingled that it really boggles the mind. Egads!


NEWS ABOUT THIS YEAR'S NUFOC CONVENTION

The 36th running of the National UFO Conference (NUFOC) will take place in San Antonio, Texas, on Saturday September 25th, at a location to be announced shortly. Dennis Stacy, former editor of the MUFON Journal, will be the local host. Confirmed speakers include Karl Pflock, Kevin Randle, Patrick Huyghe, Rick Hilberg (a co-founder of the NUFOC), and your humble "Smear" editor. More info in our next ish!


TIDBITS OF TRASH

What may happen
By ILENE GOLDENBERG and SARAH GATLING
Citizen Staff Writers
What effect will the Year 2000 bug have on you? Here are a few of the things that could happen if people do not prepare:
  • Electronic switches in the water pipeline may go down without guidance from software in Florida City.
  • Power may go out.
  • Telephones and fax machines may not work without guidance from computer software that routes calls.
  • Banks may not be able to accept your ATM card, or be able to access their records on how much money you have in their account.
  • Traffic lights may malfunction.
  • Investment companies may not be able to access their records on the money you have in your account.
  • the city and the county may lose their ability to dispatch emergency vehicles.
  • The federal government may be unable to access your tax, social security, Medicare and Medicaid records.
  • Airport control towers may lose their ability to track planes.
  • Hospitals and pharmacies may be unable to access their records on your insurance and drug allergies.
  • Grocery stores may be unable to accept debit or credit cards that expire after the year 2000.
  • Cash registers, fax machines and elevators with embedded chips may freeze.


PFLOCK PTALK - LITERARY LICENSE

by Karl Pflock, "Smear" Contributing Editor & Fifth Columnist

In his new book "Alien Abductions: Creating a Modern Phenomenon" (Amhurst, N.Y.; Prometheus, 1998, 317 PP., $26.95), University of Saskatchewan English professor Terry Matheson argues that what many think they know about UFO abduction experiences just ain't so. He also contends abduction stories have struck a strong popular chord because they meet needs similar to those that generated classical myths, and are in fact the building blocks of a modern myth addressing fears of such demons as dehumanizing technology and untrustworthy government.

Matheson's first point is on target. What too many take to be accurate abduction accounts in popular books and articles actually are significantly restructured renderings. As a Practicing Ufologist (P.U.), I find original abduction and other UFO testimony and evidence very often differ in many important and often critical respects from the retold published versions, even when the re-tellers are the principals themselves.

The imperatives of constructing a consistent, coherent, and entertaining (i.e., salable) narrative all too often conflict with those of straightforward factual representation. The narrative process abhors ambiguity, uncertainty, and neutrality. Things are left out, others are under- or overemphasized. Even with the best of intentions, the biases of the author, pro or con, inevitably creep in. Then there are the variations produced by other writers, further confusing things.

Bottom line; If you're doing UFO research, get as close to the original testimony and evidence as you can. Unfortunately, Matheson often ignores this rule in his dissection of the works of John Fuller, Budd Hopkins, Travis Walton, and others, relying on skewed nth generation accounts for comparison. For example, he gets a lot wrong about the Hill case. Still, his analyses are instructive.

Matheson's related argument is that abduction authors have participated in the creation of a myth, "rearranging the material provided by the abductees in a manner that appealed to the public, and in doing so fulfilled a function similar to those that classical myths served", explaining "an aspect or aspects of a culture to itself". He makes an interesting if too broad case, one worthy of thoughtful consideration.

Unlike other Prometheus authors, Matheson seems not to have an ax to grind with respect to the reality of UFOs or the true nature of abductions. To a remarkable degree, his book is a debunking-free zone. His aim is to demonstrate that how and why the abduction narrative came "to be created is an area just as worthy of investigation as is the question of what is actually behind the claims the abductees are making". He's right, and this has very important implications for ufology and any hope we may have of ever understanding the UFO phenomenon(-a).

Fearless Predictions: Ufoological True Believers will denounce Matheson's work as mere literary criticism or stealthy debunkerism in the guise of literary and social analysis. Ufoological True Unbelievers will seek to kidnap it as proof that alien abductions are (de) bunk. And so The Field will squabble on.


MISSIVES FROM THE MASSES:


Man jailed trying to save ex from aliens
Associated Press
ELIZABETH - A man who claims he killed his ex-wife to protect her from being kidnapped by aliens has been sentenced to 40 years in prison.
Brent Steingraber, 39, of Roselle Park was sentenced Friday in Superior Court. He must serve at least 15 years before becoming eligible for parole.
He pleaded guilty last month to agravated manslaughter in the death of his ex-wife, Suraia Sadi, 36. He also pleaded guilty to endangering the welfare of their three boys, ages 11, 10 and 9.


Saucer Smear Index
Saucer Smear Mailbox
Please note that letters for Smear editor James Moseley should be snail-mailed to PO Box 1709, Key West, FL 33041, insofar as Cdr. Moseley is proudly computer-illiterate and determined to stay that way.

Own a genuine artifact of ufological history!
Line your birdcage for pennies a sheet!
Back issues available for the last 43 years!


HTML version by S L M