Saucer Smear
OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SAUCER & UNEXPLAINED CELESTIAL EVENTS RESEARCH SOCIETY
EDITOR AND STILL
SUPREME COMMANDER:
James W. Moseley

NON-SCHEDULED
NEWSLETTER
Volume 44, No. 3
March 20th, 1997

MAILING ADDRESS:
P. 0. Box 1709
Key West, FL 33041


"SMEAR" EDITOR SOARS TO AUTHORDOM - HOPEFULLY!

As mentioned previously, your "Smear" editor is in the process of writing a major UFO book together with noted Roswell expert Karl Pflock. There will also be cartoons by ace "Smear" cartoonist Matt Graeber. A contract has been signed, and work proceeds. The tentative title of the book is "Shockingly Close to the Truth", and we hope for publication before the end of the year, as this is The Year of the Saucer!


MISCELLANEOUS RAVINGS


COURTNEY BROWN SCOLDED BY HIS PEERS!

There is a fascinating critique of remote viewer Courtney Brown in a January 25th item on the Emory University Web Site. Brown, as our hard-core readers know, is the author of "Cosmic Voyage", reviewed in our last issue. He is also a tenured professor at Emory University in Atlanta. The critique is written by Scott Lilienfeld, an assistant professor in Emory's Department of Psychology. After vigorously defending Brown's right to exercise his academic freedom (as we would do also), Lilienfeld goes on to say:

"...Brown's book is remarkable for its virtually complete absence of any data that would qualify as scientific by even the most liberal evidential standards. His `findings' consist entirely of unverified subjective experiences, and the reader searches in vain for anything vaguely resembling a controlled experiment. Brown neglects to mention either the results of a recent government-appointed scientific panel on remote viewing, which concluded that `evidence for the operational value of remote viewing is not available, even after a decade of attempts', or the critiques by Ray Hyman, a psychologist at the University of Oregon, who has shown that the scientific evidence in support of remote viewing is seriously flawed. Philosopher David Hume maintained that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; Brown's evidence is, to be charitable, singularly unimpressive.

"In light of Brown's claims, I recently challenged him to a test of his alleged psychic abilities. I proposed that he appear at a meeting of my undergraduate seminar on Science and Pseudoscience in Psychology, where my students and I would subject him to a simple controlled experiment examining his capacity to remotely view stimuli in an adjacent room, I assured him that he would have considerable imput regarding the selection of stimulus materials, and agreed to publicize the results of this test in both Emory newspapers, regardless of its outcome.

"But Brown categorically refused. His reasoning was curious: In his e-mail response to me, he asserted that `tests of the type you have talked about are very old hat' and that the current status of remote viewing goes light years beyond that which your letter suggests'. But if Brown's psychic powers are as advanced as he claims, shouldn't he be able to pass an elementary test of these powers with flying colors?

"Brown also declined my offer on the grounds that he did `not want to drag Emory into my other activities' and that he is `rigorous about not mixing what I do elsewhere with what I do at Emory'. This rationale seems disingenuous at best. If Brown did not wish to involve Emory in his exploits, why did he list his academic affiliation with Emory in his book and on his web site? Brown apparently wants to have it both ways: He publicizes his association with Emory when it might afford him the imprimatur of academic legitimacy, but refuses to submit to scientific tests by Emory colleagues on the grounds that he does not wish to `drag Emory' into a firestorm of controversy. But it is too late: Emory's reputation has already been besmirched. As George Armelagos of the Department of Anthropology notes, `Brown is naive if he believes his fantasies do not affect the image of the University'"


UPBEAT UPDATES ON UPCOMING CONVENTIONS:


BOOKS WORTH BROWSING:

Finally cometh, after many years of semi-mysterious delay, the definitive work on the late 1980 series of alleged UFO incidents at Bentwaters, England, also called the RendleSHAM Case in earlier issues of "Saucer Smear". The authors are Larry Warren, a former U.S. serviceman stationed in England, and his friend Peter Robbins, a long-time UFO investigator. The exact title of the book is: "Left at East Gate - A First-Hand Account of the Bentwaters-Woodbridge UFO Incident, its Cover-Up and Investigation". The publisher is Marlowe & Co. of 632 Broadway, New York City, and the book is boldly listed as non-fiction. We have an advance copy of "Uncorrected Proofs". The real book is due out in May.

Larry Warren's story is somewhat unbelievable. As a military policeman, he was sent on the night of Dec. 28th, 1980 to be one of many military witnesses to a landed UFO near the base. It had three weird beings inside it. A couple of days later, Larry was ordered to a secret place underneath the base, where an ET of some sort gave him an outline of the continuing contact between their civilization and ours, going all the way back to World War II.

The usual question arises: Since Warren had no "need to know", why was he informed of all these secret things? That is what invalidates the whole story, as far as we are concerned!

We do believe one part of the book: On New Year's Eve, which started just a few hours after his long meeting with the ET, Larry got drunk and deliberately locked himself inside a refrigerator at a party (P. 63). He then crashed through a girl friend's window on the way home, and passed out on the floor!

It is true that Larry Warren is a party animal. Now a civilian, he lectured at one of Tim Beckley's colorful conventions in Phoenix, Arizona a couple of years ago. Late one night, he was seen loudly cavorting naked with a couple of naked women in the motel sauna. The police were called, and eventually a police helicopter flew low over the motel courtyard, shining its searchlight down, just as a UFO might do. Your editor had already gone to bed, and thus missed all the fun & excitement! We are not knocking Larry; In our mad youth we would have been right out there with him!

Conclusion: Larry Warren is a great guy, but his book badly needs a shot of truth serum!


LETTERS TO YE OLDE EDITOR:


ON UFOs, HOW TO IDENTIFY:
They had the letters "UFO" on the side.
woman interviewee on NBC-TV, when asked by John Chancellor how she could be sure the flying objects she had seen were unidentified


Saucer Smear Index
Saucer Smear Mailbox
Please note that letters for Smear editor James Moseley should be snail-mailed to PO Box 1709, Key West, FL 33041, insofar as Cdr. Moseley is proudly computer-illiterate and determined to stay that way.

Own a genuine artifact of ufological history!
Line your birdcage for pennies a sheet!
Back issues available for the last 43 years!


HTML version by S L M